Olympic budget
#31
Posted 26 January 2012 - 04:43 PM
#32
Posted 26 January 2012 - 04:48 PM
Can see the clipboard brigade with an entire row of pens & pencils in their top pocket now !
Dazza
#33
Posted 26 January 2012 - 05:41 PM
Would that be a football stadium eh Dazza?Like moving a stadium on the Park ?
Can see the clipboard brigade with an entire row of pens & pencils in their top pocket now !
Dazza
#34
Posted 31 January 2012 - 01:22 PM
The point about the Lea Valley Authority is this: Londoners are currently committeed to a £625m contribution to LVP however the passover of Olympic responsibilty to the LVA means there is now real potential for the LVA to increase this levy to meet the massive Olympic overspends. Londoners will be paying for the pleasure of the games for many years to come.
Good to read that Lambeth, Southwark and Lewisham are beginning to question the viability of the arrangement.
A HISTORIC town hall tax that funds a nature reserve many residents have never visited is being called into question. Councils across the capital are funding the Lee Valley Regional Park Authority (LVRPA) in north and east London, Essex and Hertfordshire to the tune of almost £12million a year.
Now authorities in Lambeth, Lewisham and Southwark, which this year paid £867,000 in a levy to the LVRPA, are questioning the
payments at a time when their funding is being cut by the Government.
The payment scheme was set up to fund improvements to the 10,000-acre nature reserve, which was established under an Act of Parliament in 1966.
Today, the park authority owns 20 per cent of the Olympic Park in Stratford, and has received multimillion-pound payments from the Olympic Delivery Authority. The park will play host to the Olympic white water centre.
After the Games, the LVRPA will also run hockey and tennis centres and the cycling Velodrome in Stratford. Lambeth council needed to save £37m last year and a further £29m this year following Government cuts.
The savings target has led to council job losses and spending on street cleaning and public parks reduced.
Yet in the past three financial years, it has paid £946,000 to the LVRPA.
Town hall leader Councillor Steve Reed, told the South London Press: “It seems highly questionable that Lambeth’s money is being used to pay for a park the other side of London that most South Londoners have never heard of.
http://www.slp.co.uk...%80%99t%20ours?
#35
Posted 06 May 2012 - 10:37 PM
Little wonder the budget's gone nuclear but what's the logic behind positioning of Ground Based Air Defence Systems in densely populated areas? A successful strike will result in the target being brought down over residential areas in the vicinity of Blackheath Common and Oxleas Wood in south east London, and at William Girling Reservoir Chain in Enfield and Barn Hill at Netherhouse Farm in Epping Forest.
Once an enemy target is identified missiles are "guided towards the target at speed in excess of Mach 2.5 by passive infrared line of sight and active command to radar line of sight. The automatic reaction time is less than 5s and a second target engagement takes less than 3s." Mach 2 is twice the speed of sound so mach 2.5 is pdq! The collison with any incoming target will be significant - like wise the fallout from the hit.
#36
Posted 14 May 2012 - 10:29 AM
#37
Posted 14 May 2012 - 11:22 AM
Well, we're getting set for showtime but what's going down with the urban missiles sites?
MoD unveils surface-to-air cockneys...
http://www.thedailym...ys-201204305175
Edited by Sidney Ruff-Diamond, 14 May 2012 - 11:23 AM.
#38
Posted 14 May 2012 - 11:41 AM
Now that would be real interesting firework display !
Edited by Summit Lover, 14 May 2012 - 12:02 PM.
#39
Posted 14 May 2012 - 03:44 PM
MoD unveils surface-to-air cockneys...
http://www.thedailym...ys-201204305175
I'm all in favour of using Cockneys as missiles, mainly because I wasn't born within the sound of Bow bells, in fact miles and miles from there.
However, I am a great believer that leaders should lead their own in to battle (a bit like Blair should have gone in to Iraq (and not come back)) so hopefully the first wave will consist of Pearly Kings and Queens - all those buttons make for a lot of shrapnel! This is all before Phillip Hammond makes a U turn and opts to use the cheaper SAS - the dreaded Surface to Air Scousers.
#40
Posted 14 May 2012 - 05:47 PM
#41
Posted 14 May 2012 - 08:37 PM
I'm all in favour of using Cockneys as missiles...This is all before Phillip Hammond makes a U turn and opts to use the cheaper SAS - the dreaded Surface to Air Scousers.
Local missiles for local people Senor? Yours and Sir Ruff- Diamond's Olympic Defence Systems make the Cuban missile crisis look like a virtual Tea Party.
Never mind the Cockneys and Scousers I'm more concerned about the Mujahideen. If I was a bearded gentleman of a certain disposition then I'd have already sourced meself a lauchpad, somewhere high up, somewhere with a great view of London and somewhere with excellent telecommunications signals, from where I could disguise me hardware as a landfill recovery vehcile (LRV) and then just like a Thunderbird I'd park up and launch me attack with one of these:
#42
Posted 15 May 2012 - 09:00 AM
Back to missiles and Olympics - beginning to feel that after 40 years, since Munich '72 it's all beginning to make me feel is it all worth it? Since then everyone has been 'aware' of a threat, but I guess 9/11 made the Western superpowers targets, particularly US and UK. Now the setting up of 'defensive' missile banks and those potential tubes manned by bearded (bit of profiling there) blokes implies a pitched battle in the offing.
Goes without saying, we don't want an incident, but 40 yrs on and with the unresolved issues of the world being taken to the Games and will continue to be until they make a real impact.
How long before we hear the IOC chief announcing, ….. opening envelope… - "the Games are awarded to....... "the city of - Tel Aviv"
I'm all in favour of wrapping them up, the Games that is, and it's not giving in to the terrorists, it's a big big very expensive bore, and the athletes and the drugs cheats debate is just beginning to wind up.... Apart from that - come on GB!
#43
Posted 15 May 2012 - 10:20 AM
those potential tubes manned by bearded (bit of profiling there) blokes implies a pitched battle in the offing.
Did I miss something? Don't understand this reference.
#44
Posted 15 May 2012 - 10:37 AM
#45
Posted 15 May 2012 - 11:05 AM
Did I miss something? Don't understand this reference.
..was referring to Citizen M's Scud launcher - "Never mind the Cockneys and Scousers I'm more concerned about the Mujahideen. If I was a bearded gentleman of a certain disposition then I'd have already sourced meself a lauchpad"












