Crystal Palace Tramlink
#16
Posted 11 October 2006 - 11:51 AM
(TfL) is launching a public consultation about a proposed Tramlink extension.
The extension would link the existing Tramlink network with the Anerley and Crystal Palace areas with up to six trams an hour running on the route by 2013.
People participating in the consultation, which starts next week, can choose from three options.
continued...
The first option is to run the tram up Anerley Road and Anerley Hill into Crystal Palace bus station through the edge of the park.
Another option is to run the tram fully off-street beside the railway to Crystal Palace station and then along the edge of the park behind the museum.
The final option is to mix the two with the trams running on the street up to the station and then off-street through the edge of the park.
It is expected four million passengers a year will use the proposed service.
London Mayor Ken Livingstone believes the extension will help regenerate Anerley and Crystal Palace Park and improve transport links in south London as a whole.
TfL had also proposed to build an extension linking Crystal Palace directly to Beckenham Junction.
This idea has been withdrawn because it would have involved building a completely new tram line and was considered to be too expensive.
Both Tramlink extension schemes are supported by Bromley Council.
Its head of transport strategy Ian Forbes said: "We have consistently supported the extension of Tramlink to Crystal Palace.
"We also supported the link between Beckenham Junction and Crystal Palace and we hope it is brought back to the table as well."
Funding for the tram scheme exists as part of TfL's five-year investment plan but there is no guarantee it will be built because it has to be approved by the Government after the public consultation.
Residents interested in taking part in the consultation should look in next week's News Shopper for more details.
#17
Posted 13 October 2006 - 09:44 AM
Most of the traders see the tram as a good way to regenerate a flagging town. If more customers come here, small independent shops will bother to open up. Therefore I would urge people to think long and hard before objecting to this one.
#18
Posted 13 October 2006 - 12:31 PM
#19
Posted 13 October 2006 - 01:08 PM
Maybe the area needs some strong movement of oposition to the CPCA if we don't want to end up living in a forgotten ghost town in the future.
#20
Posted 13 October 2006 - 02:06 PM
Moderator's NoteMaybe the area needs some strong movement of oposition to the CPCA if we don't want to end up living in a forgotten ghost town in the future.
You are very much entitled to your own opinion. However due to previous problems with discussion of the CPCA this issue falls under the category of politics and as such is restricted from further discussion on our forum.
#21
Posted 13 October 2006 - 02:41 PM
#22
Posted 13 October 2006 - 02:51 PM
#23
Posted 20 October 2006 - 06:41 PM
#24
Posted 20 October 2006 - 11:29 PM
Nick
#25
Posted 21 October 2006 - 11:31 AM
#26
Posted 23 October 2006 - 08:34 PM
In my limited experience (Holešovice in Prague and Dolores Park in San Francisco), I've found trams integrate well with parks.
#27
Posted 25 October 2006 - 08:03 PM
Lloyd Park is an excellent example of how modern transportation can integrate well with the natural environment.
Let's just hope that the extension is not blocked on the grounds of conservation - progress isn't always a good thing, but in this case it's a fantastic opportunity for the area.
Bring it on!
#28
Posted 26 October 2006 - 08:17 AM
#29
Posted 26 October 2006 - 09:31 AM
http://www.tfl.gov.u...tep/index.shtml
Exhibition Details
Ledrington Road (portacabin)
Thursday 2 November, 11am to 8pm
Friday 3 November, 11am to 8pm
Saturday 4 November 12 noon to 5pm
Upper Norwood Salvation Army Hall, Westow Street
Friday 10 November 11am to 8pm
Saturday 11 November 12 noon to 5pm
#30
Posted 26 October 2006 - 10:10 AM












